A new Pull Request was created by @consuegs for branch IB/CMSSW_13_2_X/master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

please test

-1

Failed Tests: Build
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f94bab/32419/summary.html
COMMIT: 766b9e9
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/8496/32419/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Build

I found compilation error when building:

>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/src/TrajectoryFactoryPlugin.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/src/TrajectoryFactoryBase.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/src/TwoBodyDecayTrajectory.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/src/TwoBodyDecayTrajectoryState.cc
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/src/ReferenceTrajectory.cc: In member function 'virtual bool ReferenceTrajectory::addMaterialEffectsLocalGbl(const std::vector&, const std::vector&, const std::vector&, const std::vector&)':
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/src/ReferenceTrajectory.cc:1020:29: error: call of overloaded 'addScatterer(Eigen::CwiseNullaryOp, Eigen::Matrix >&, const Eigen::Inverse >)' is ambiguous
 1020 |       aGblPoint.addScatterer(scatterer, scatPrecision.inverse());
      |       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/testBuildDir/el8_amd64_gcc11/external/gbl/V03-01-00-2daef1dd46a25e8e24e576a21371fcc0/include/GblTrajectory.h:36,
                 from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/interface/ReferenceTrajectoryBase.h:103,
                 from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-05-05-1100/src/Alignment/ReferenceTrajectories/interface/ReferenceTrajectory.h:38,


If my understanding is correct, the test fails due to the gbl update commit. Since this was a secondary update to the original scope of the PR of adding the LAPACK solution method with openblas, one proposal could be going back to the gbl version on master. Let me know your thoughts

assign alca
@consuegs , its really up to the requirement, if updated version of GBL is required then I guess we need cmssw update to go with it.

New categories assigned: alca

@francescobrivio,@saumyaphor4252,@tvami you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

its really up to the requirement, if updated version of GBL is required then I guess we need cmssw update to go with it.

sure if we need it, let's do it, I dont know of other costumer then TkAli who'd get affected

@consuegs , should we revert the gbl update or are you going to provide a CMSSW PR to go with newer version of gbl?

Pull request #8496 was updated.

@smuzaffar, I am ok with reverting the gbl update commit and proceeding

please test

Pull request #8496 was updated.

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f94bab/34880/summary.html
COMMIT: 2b5d04f
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-09-24-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/8496/34880/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 3 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3358044
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3358022
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

please test for el8_aarch64_gcc11

please test for el8_ppc64le_gcc11

+externals

@saumyaphor4252 , @perrotta , @consuegs any objections on millepede V04-13-02 update?

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f94bab/34885/summary.html
COMMIT: 2b5d04f
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-09-24-2300/el8_aarch64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/8496/34885/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f94bab/34886/summary.html
COMMIT: 2b5d04f
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-09-24-2300/el8_ppc64le_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/8496/34886/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

• 24900.024900.0_CloseByPGun_CE_H_Coarse_Scint+2026D98/step2_CloseByPGun_CE_H_Coarse_Scint+2026D98.log
• 24896.024896.0_CloseByPGun_CE_E_Front_120um+2026D98/step2_CloseByPGun_CE_E_Front_120um+2026D98.log
• 24834.024834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D98/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D98.log

@consuegs is this still relevant, in light of #9053 ? if not please close.